If in 1925 women had gained an equal voice in how money is spent, teaching and law would have followed radically different economic paths. In our timeline, teaching became a heavily female-dominated profession (76% women in 2022) and suffered a 20–30% wage penalty due to occupational devaluation, while law remained male-dominated with an artificial wage premium. With gender parity from 1925, teaching would not have feminized to this degree, removing the wage penalty, while women legislators—who allocate 1.5–1.7× more to education—would have driven education budgets 25–35% higher. Over a century, compounded funding increases push teacher pay more than four times higher than in our reality, while the “male premium” in law salaries disappears. By 2024, teachers earn 12–18% more than lawyers, reflecting the true social and economic value of education.
76